Date
1 - 13 of 13
from DM63
|
Tom N7GP
Well put!!!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Tom N7GP 73 Tom From: "Keith Morehouse" <w9rm@...>
Sender: main@nmvhf.groups.io
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:49:29 -0700 To: <main@nmvhf.groups.io> ReplyTo: main@nmvhf.groups.io
Subject: Re: [nmvhf] from DM63 ...a LOT of evidence. And no, there was no reported sporadic E. I talked to 'DRH later in the day and he verified it was meteors. 1100 miles is at the high end of what I consider the M/S 'sweet spot' distance of 900-1100 miles, where two decently equipped station can make contact pretty much 12-18 hours a day. This is the same distance where two WELL equipped stations (running KW into 4-5+ elements) can connect on ionoscatter during most of the day. If you're persistent on 6, you don't need no steekin' Es... The practical limit for M/S is somewhere between 1300-1500 miles, same as Es - this is single "hop", of course. You may note that the 2M M/S record is MUCH farther then that, which has had many people, me included, sceptical for years. But, that's a conversation for another time. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 11:14 AM James Duffey <JamesDuffey@...> wrote: Don’t know about Es yesterday morning, but most of the meteor ionization is at the same altitude as the E layer, so the distances involved would be about the same. |
|
|
|
Keith Morehouse
...a LOT of evidence. And no, there was no reported sporadic E. I talked to 'DRH later in the day and he verified it was meteors. 1100 miles is at the high end of what I consider the M/S 'sweet spot' distance of 900-1100 miles, where two decently equipped station can make contact pretty much 12-18 hours a day. This is the same distance where two WELL equipped stations (running KW into 4-5+ elements) can connect on ionoscatter during most of the day. If you're persistent on 6, you don't need no steekin' Es... The practical limit for M/S is somewhere between 1300-1500 miles, same as Es - this is single "hop", of course. You may note that the 2M M/S record is MUCH farther then that, which has had many people, me included, sceptical for years. But, that's a conversation for another time. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 11:14 AM James Duffey <JamesDuffey@...> wrote: Don’t know about Es yesterday morning, but most of the meteor ionization is at the same altitude as the E layer, so the distances involved would be about the same. |
|
|
|
James Duffey
Don’t know about Es yesterday morning, but most of the meteor ionization is at the same altitude as the E layer, so the distances involved would be about the same.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There is some evidence, although far from conclusive, and lots of conjecture, that the ions in the E layer contributing to Es are the result of meteors. - Duffey James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM On Jan 16, 2020, at 10:51, Steve London <n2ic@...> wrote: |
|
|
|
Steve N2IC
Was there also some Es happening ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Steve, N2IC On 01/16/2020 10:22 AM, Keith Morehouse wrote:
K2DRH in EN41 was also calling Bruce, but was running very low power due to antenna icing. That's probably close to 1000 miles. Nice job from a portable setup. |
|
|
|
James Duffey
1119 miles according to this:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
1800 kM, not too far from the maximum meteor scatter distance of about 2000kM. Very good for your relatively simple setup. - Duffey James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM On Jan 16, 2020, at 10:23, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Keith Morehouse
K2DRH in EN41 was also calling Bruce, but was running very low power due to antenna icing. That's probably close to 1000 miles. Nice job from a portable setup. I was watching PSKREPORTER while Bruce was CQing and he was getting reported as far away as Alabama. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 10:13 AM Bruce Draper <bruceaa5b@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Bruce Draper
>> Can you give us details on your best DX? Looks like EM48, St Louis area, >800 miles. |
|
|
|
James Duffey
Nice work Bruce. Can you give us details on your best DX?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM On Jan 15, 2020, at 10:48, Bruce Draper <bruceaa5b@...> wrote: |
|
|
|
Bill
Well done guys!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 15, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Michael Daly
Bruce,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
That's a lot of weight on the trailer hitch. Good going. Mike, n5sj -----Original Message-----
From: main@nmvhf.groups.io [mailto:main@nmvhf.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bruce Draper Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:48 AM To: nmvhf@groups.io Subject: [nmvhf] from DM63 Here's a photo from my DM63 operation on Wednesday morning. Worked W9RM on MSK144 for his last NM grid, along with about 15 other guys, plus 2 more on FT8. Bruce AA5B |
|
|
|
Mike WB2FKO
Congratulations, I imagine you are getting close to FFMA? Mike WB2FKO On 1/15/20 12:52 PM, Keith Morehouse
wrote:
|
|
|
|
Keith Morehouse
Bruce, you had good, consistent scatter pings whenever you were pointed my direction. Real good for 300-350 miles. Thanks for going out and for the last DM-field grid. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 10:48 AM Bruce Draper <bruceaa5b@...> wrote: Here's a photo from my DM63 operation on Wednesday morning. Worked W9RM on MSK144 for his last NM grid, along with about 15 other guys, plus 2 more on FT8. |
|
|
|
Bruce Draper
Here's a photo from my DM63 operation on Wednesday morning. Worked W9RM on MSK144 for his last NM grid, along with about 15 other guys, plus 2 more on FT8.
Bruce AA5B 
|
|
|