Not much to offer for CQWW
Bob Norton
OK, I admit that I am less motivated than most of you! Got home Saturday PM to discover any band opening was over.
|
|
AA5PR/R in CQWW VHF
John Klem
I stayed pretty close to home for this one: DM75 and DM74 Saturday, and DM55 Sunday.
Saturday was not great, although it picked up somewhat later in the day when I was in DM74. I was happy to work a few east coast stations, but I suspect that many stations in EM were pointing east or toward Asia instead of toward us. I didn't spend much time planning the trip to DM55, so it was great to find a nice forested spot right on the continental divide, with a good radio horizon in most directions. About 20% of my QSOs were SSB, and the remainder FT8. I would have enjoyed making more SSB contacts, but that well ran dry pretty quickly. FT4 will wait until I implement fully automated logging, which didn't seem necessary until now. The lack of 2 m activity was pretty disappointing, but it took some of the sting out of the realization that my brand new 2 m amplifier wouldn't key on SSB. Total contacts: 133 Total multipliers: 80 Score: 10,880 Station 6 m: 100 W + Moxon 2 m: 4 W SSB, 80 W FT8 + 7 elements John, AA5PR
|
|
Re: After Action Report (DM77,DM78,DM87,DM88)
KC7QY
Interesting observation Jonesey. I just went back and looked at my 2018 summary. Twice the Qs and mults under worse propagation running SSB and CW only last year. Score nearly 3X last year over this. Jim KC7QY
On Monday, July 22, 2019, 05:34:02 PM MDT, Jonesy W3DHJ via Groups.Io <mailserver@...> wrote:
OK, after proof-reading my paper log with my transcribed Cabrillo log, I corrected several errors. So, my new claimed score is: 3588 which is about 1/9th of my 2018 score. ... and, will no doubt will be reduced further by the contest robot. (It never seems to be increased,....)
|
|
Re: After Action Report (DM77,DM78,DM87,DM88)
OK, after proof-reading my paper log with my transcribed Cabrillo log,
I corrected several errors. So, my new claimed score is: 3588 which is about 1/9th of my 2018 score. ... and, will no doubt will be reduced further by the contest robot. (It never seems to be increased,....)
|
|
Re: W9RM CQWW-VHF
Keith Morehouse
Oh - 500W + 4 el will put you into the "Big Dog" rover class on meteor scatter ! MSK144 is very easy to learn and use and there is a huge following by both the casual VHF guys AND the FFMA guys. I don't have access to the list right now but I'll bet there are more then one "rare" NM grids for FFMA. Once you get your head around how meteors work and when the best time to operate is, it's a piece of cake ! Heck, with 500W on your end, I'm sure we could work on CW. -W9RM Keith J Morehouse Managing Partner Calmesa Partners G.P. Olathe, CO
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:56 AM Bruce Draper <bruceaa5b@...> wrote: I can do 500 W + the 4 elements ;-)
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
Scott K5TA
Yes, I got the message, and replied — I guess I should have tried to put your call in there to “make it red” but couldn’t figure how to jam it all in quickly. You would have had to know my TX freq to be sure who was talking.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-TA
On Jul 22, 2019, at 2:41 PM, James Duffey <JamesDuffey@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
James Duffey
Scott - There were a couple of times when I heard you calling CQ on FT8 that I used the free form message to see if you would QSY to 2M. I never got a response, I wonder if you got the message or not. If you got it and didn’t want to QSY, that is OK, I see you were 6M only. If you got it and didn’t understand I would like to know that too, so I can change my technique in the future. - Duffey
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM
On Jul 22, 2019, at 14:14, Bill <bill4070@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: email posting to groups.io
.... and that's how I send the email:
From : Jonesy W3DHJ <mailserver@...>
Reply-To: Jonesy W3DHJ <W3DHJ@...>
To : NM VHF <nmvhf@groups.io>
|
|
Re: email posting to groups.io
Mike WB2FKO
Jonesy,
The email address that you subscribed
with is mailserver@.... If you don't use that address when
replying, the server will reject the message. It is setup this
way to prevent robots from spamming the list.
Mike WB2FKO
On 7/22/19 2:09 PM, Jonesy W3DHJ via
Groups.Io wrote:
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
Bill
Scott, Nice work on 300+! When working the DXpedition(s) I became obsessed about stations sharing signal reports but not grids. That until Mike FKO reminded me that I had made legal contacts because I was not in a contest and therefore any exchange will pass for a legal contact...... even funny little numbers. I'll be glad when this newby confusion ends...... Bill W7QQ
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:29 PM Scott K5TA <k5ta@...> wrote:
|
|
email posting to groups.io
I cannot post via email to nmvhf@groups.io -- I could in the past.
I tried several pre-contest schedule postings and the all came back: Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Arrival-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; nmvhf@groups.io
Original-Recipient: rfc822;nmvhf@groups.io
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.1
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to lb01.groups.io[45.79.81.153]:25:
Operation timed out
I _AM_ receiving all the posts of others, and in reading those "reflected" email headers, I believe they are (successfully) posting by email. Anybody else with this problem? Any suggestions? It's a PITA to have to use the browser UI....
|
|
After Action Report (DM77,DM78,DM87,DM88)
Well, there wasn't all that much "action"...
The 2M Es early on Saturday afternoon was nice --
-- which caused some confusion in my paper logging
when the 2M Es covered some of the same grids I
was also working on 6M!!
I want to thank the regional ops that worked me, W0ETT,
WE7L, K0NR, K5ZG, WB0RRU, KI0TI, and exo-regional W9RM!
And, a special thanks to the other front range,
indomitable rover: George, AB0YM/r.
QSOs by Activated Grid:
Grid QSOs
DM77 13
DM78 4
DM87 16
DM88 25
Score Summary
Band QSOs Value QSOPts Mults
50 37 1 37 33
144 21 2 42 14
Totals: 58 79 47
Claimed Score: 3713
Old school - SSB & CW (groups.io offers lots of eye-candy options for posting, but it seems you're out of luck if you want fixed-pitch test.)
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
Scott K5TA
To add a little extra confusion to the stew, I have noticed that some people, mostly on (grid) DXpeditions have been calling CQ TEST outside of contests, especially on MSK144, probably looking for the shortest possible QSOs.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
My total is shown below. Very casual FT8 only. The big advantage of that mode for me is that I can sit in the bedroom watching TV with an iPad in my lap and work people via a remote desktop app.
I did work TI2 for a new DXCC, and enough grids to put me over 300 if everyone uploads to LoTW. I’m happy.
-Scott K5TA
On Jul 22, 2019, at 11:39 AM, James Duffey <JamesDuffey@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
James Duffey
Don’t worry about the NIL. I suspect that most of the guys doing that are casual contestants and won’t submit a log.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM
On Jul 22, 2019, at 10:00, KC7QY <kc7qy@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
James Duffey
Yes I saw this operating at W5UHF. At first I thought it was me as this was the first time I seriously operated FT8 in a contest, but Bill saw what was happening and enlightened me Those stations usually (always?) sent their grid in the CQ, which FT8 usually captured. When the station repeated the Marshall numbers, Bill told me to hit the rrr73 exchange, which gets the other guy out of the repeat mode and ends the contact. The grid is usually captured by FT8 and can be logged normally, but, if not, it is easy to fill it in by hand and log the QSO.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
This seemed to happen more on Saturday than Sunday. - Duffey James Duffey KK6MC Cedar Crest NM
On Jul 22, 2019, at 09:35, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: FT8 contest mode incompatibly
KC7QY
Keith, I also saw a lot of non-TEST CQs. Generally I passed them by and worked the ones calling CQ Test (probably hurt my humble score but that's another story). The ones I did call or who called me when I was CQing generally came back with a 73 after my RR 73. Guess I'll have to wait for the log checking report to see how many NIL I get back. Jim KC7QY
On Monday, July 22, 2019, 09:36:00 AM MDT, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
Anyone seriously operating this weekends contest and using FT8 probably had this happen.
You're cruising .313 looking for those new mults or whatever, you see someone CQing WITHOUT the word TEST in the CQ message and you instinctively know they're not in contest mode. No worries, you think. The WSJTX boffins have tuned the program to compensate for the difference in exchange and you know autosequence will seamlessly pull you through. You call and, sure enough, back comes the 'funny little number' exchange. You reply with a NA contest mode exchange (because you're contesting, right ?) and.... back comes a repeat - no autosequence. What ?? OK, maybe I got QRMed. Try again, and same thing. You can't progress to the finish. What you do now is left to the individual. What I did was terminate the Q and moved on. You might have fiddled with the setup to switch out of contest mode. Whatever... the Q was either made or not. What this did, other then temporarily piss me off and cause name calling that nobody heard but me and the shack spiders, was confused me. HOW could this happen....the boffins....they fixed this. Was the other guy manually interfering with autosequence ? Was the other guy that insistent on his funny number ? I started ignoring those obviously not in contest mode. This morning, after reading a soapbox comment on 3830, it finally hit me.... (I'm pretty focused on operating during the 'test). It's.....The Clones !! Those knock-offs of WSJT - JTDX, MHSV ! THEY don't have contest mode ! They can't autosequence past TX2. So, what to do about this incompatibly ? It's pretty obvious the clones aren't going to add CM if they haven't already and there are those contest haters that wouldn't use it anyway, but still insist on trying to WORK contesters. I'm thinking maybe the solution is to add some kind of 'quick button' behavior to WSJTX that drops the program out of contest mode for just one Q and resets back into CM after the 73 (or something). Does anyone have another idea ? If a number of high level contesters presented such a request maybe the WSJT powers would respond. Or, maybe you think it's a non-issue....or maybe a quick work around all ready exists that doesn't require a guy to drop in and change his setup and I'm just clueless ? -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG
|
|
Re: W9RM CQWW-VHF
Bruce Draper
I can do 500 W + the 4 elements ;-)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Haven’t tried MSK, but I am set up for FT8. Let’s talk about it... -Bruce
On Monday, July 22, 2019, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
|
|
FT8 contest mode incompatibly
Keith Morehouse
Anyone seriously operating this weekends contest and using FT8 probably had this happen. You're cruising .313 looking for those new mults or whatever, you see someone CQing WITHOUT the word TEST in the CQ message and you instinctively know they're not in contest mode. No worries, you think. The WSJTX boffins have tuned the program to compensate for the difference in exchange and you know autosequence will seamlessly pull you through. You call and, sure enough, back comes the 'funny little number' exchange. You reply with a NA contest mode exchange (because you're contesting, right ?) and.... back comes a repeat - no autosequence. What ?? OK, maybe I got QRMed. Try again, and same thing. You can't progress to the finish. What you do now is left to the individual. What I did was terminate the Q and moved on. You might have fiddled with the setup to switch out of contest mode. Whatever... the Q was either made or not. What this did, other then temporarily piss me off and cause name calling that nobody heard but me and the shack spiders, was confused me. HOW could this happen....the boffins....they fixed this. Was the other guy manually interfering with autosequence ? Was the other guy that insistent on his funny number ? I started ignoring those obviously not in contest mode. This morning, after reading a soapbox comment on 3830, it finally hit me.... (I'm pretty focused on operating during the 'test). It's.....The Clones !! Those knock-offs of WSJT - JTDX, MHSV ! THEY don't have contest mode ! They can't autosequence past TX2. So, what to do about this incompatibly ? It's pretty obvious the clones aren't going to add CM if they haven't already and there are those contest haters that wouldn't use it anyway, but still insist on trying to WORK contesters. I'm thinking maybe the solution is to add some kind of 'quick button' behavior to WSJTX that drops the program out of contest mode for just one Q and resets back into CM after the 73 (or something). Does anyone have another idea ? If a number of high level contesters presented such a request maybe the WSJT powers would respond. Or, maybe you think it's a non-issue....or maybe a quick work around all ready exists that doesn't require a guy to drop in and change his setup and I'm just clueless ? -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG
|
|
Re: W9RM CQWW-VHF
Keith Morehouse
Sounds like you've got a good system. I need to work DM63 for my last NM grid. It's too close for E skip, but it's do-able on scatter with enough power on the DM63 end. Using one of the WSJTX modes with their better S/N, makes it even more likely. It can also be effective any time of year, meaning one doesn't need to focus on those 3 months of potential sporadic E. If you can put 100W on the air using MSK144 or FT8, I'll bet we could complete. I'll also bet I'm not the only guy who needs that grid. Morning meteor scatter at that power with 4 elements gives you 1000 mile capability. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, 6:58 AM Bruce Draper <bruceaa5b@...> wrote: I operated on 6 for just a little while on Saturday in the spaces between dog class, shopping, yard work, and volleyball practice. But as others have pointed out, conditions were bad and few QSOs were made.
|
|
Re: W9RM CQWW-VHF
Bruce Draper
I operated on 6 for just a little while on Saturday in the spaces between dog class, shopping, yard work, and volleyball practice. But as others have pointed out, conditions were bad and few QSOs were made.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Sunday morning I finished working on a 6-meter portable yagi that I’d started building on Friday, so I threw some gear in the truck and drove to a nice spot in DM64. It takes literally less than 2 minutes to take the yagi out of the vehicle, assemble it, and get it in the air. Another 2 minutes to start the generator and be on the air. With the better conditions, I worked a dozen stations from ABQ to SoCal while running only 15 Watts and the antenna at only 6 feet. SSB only, didn’t take the laptop for FT8. Didn’t stay out there long — it was just a test run, and it started raining not long after I arrived. But I at least demonstrated that I now have a portable station that I can use on the spur of the moment. BTW, electrically the antenna is a 4-el YU7EF design, but I mutated it to a snap-together PVC and wire affair. Seems to have a great pattern and good gain. -Bruce AA5B
On Sunday, July 21, 2019, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:
|
|