1. Messages
  2. DM95

Re: DM95

James Duffey
 

I would think that FT4 would be better than FT8 with respect to meteor scatter. The time interval is half, so the odds of a meteor ping are halved too I think. 

James Duffey KK6MC
Cedar Crest NM

On Sep 13, 2019, at 10:44, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@...> wrote:

FT8 officially sucks as a mode when there is meteor scatter mixed in.  Just a single big ping of scatter within FT8's 15 sec receive window will likely prevent a decode on a weak signal.

I suspect FT4 would suffer the same.. maybe worse.

-W9RM

Keith Morehouse
via MotoG

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 10:38 AM Ed <n5jeh@...> wrote:

No just shorter requirement for a exchange. A  short ping on FT8 is useless but a contact can be made with msk with nothing but short pings. Takes a lot of time however

 

Ed N5jeh

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

 

ED  N5JEH   DM65RD

 

From: Steve London
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 10:32 AM
To: nmvhf@groups.io
Subject: Re: [nmvhf] DM95

 

Why ? Are you saying that the only mechanism that could support a QSO is meteor

scatter ?

 

73,

Steve, N2IC

 

On 09/13/2019 10:20 AM, Ed wrote:

> MSK  144 would work better for that distance with no other propagation to help.

> Just MHO

>

> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

>

> *ED  N5JEH   DM65RD*

>

> *From: *Arne N7KA <mailto:N7KA@...>

> *Sent: *Friday, September 13, 2019 8:52 AM

> *To: *NMVHF <mailto:nmvhf@groups.io>

> *Subject: *[nmvhf] DM95

>

> I copied N5KS on 6M FT8 yesterday with good sigs -8 to -14.  I am trying to work

> him for new 6M grid and sent him  an email about looking this way and into

> Olathe during the contest this weeked.   He is in Amarillo.  N5EPA might have a

> good chance, possibly W7QQ.

>

> Arne N7KA

>

>

 

 

 
Join main@nmvhf.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.